Comments on: Dada Technology http://palomar5.org/2009/12/19/dada-technology/ Exploring creative space Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:12:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Carl Methews http://palomar5.org/2009/12/19/dada-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-204 Carl Methews Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:39:46 +0000 http://palomar5.org/?p=1150#comment-204 @Edward: who ignores and fights me? @Valentin: this is so vague, I search for a sense and meaning in your words. You're right about Natal and minority Report, but: Why is your DADA no new creation? I thought this was one of the aims of P5? Which tools? Knives, stoves, refrigerator? Why is a computer no tool, I think that it is a tool? How could the advancing of more high-tech in our "human real life" be more helpful and less garbage-/carbonoxid-producing than now? thanks guys, keep it on @Edward: who ignores and fights me?
@Valentin: this is so vague, I search for a sense and meaning in your words.
You’re right about Natal and minority Report, but:
Why is your DADA no new creation? I thought this was one of the aims of P5?
Which tools? Knives, stoves, refrigerator? Why is a computer no tool, I think that it is a tool?
How could the advancing of more high-tech in our “human real life” be more helpful and less garbage-/carbonoxid-producing than now?

thanks guys, keep it on

]]> By: Edward Harran http://palomar5.org/2009/12/19/dada-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-202 Edward Harran Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:19:32 +0000 http://palomar5.org/?p=1150#comment-202 Dear Carl, You embody what Gandhai said: First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. Thanks for the reminder. Be well. Eddie Dear Carl,

You embody what Gandhai said:

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

Thanks for the reminder.

Be well.

Eddie

]]> By: Valentin http://palomar5.org/2009/12/19/dada-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-201 Valentin Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:38:36 +0000 http://palomar5.org/?p=1150#comment-201 DADA has not the aim to create something "New". It has the aim to give a computer the most natural and therefore oldest gestures back, we have. Give and Take. It is not a Gamepad or another Idea how to use fingers to work with the computer. It is a implementation of natural human interaction using computer devices. The Goal for DADA is to change Computers in to Tools. Tools, humans can use in the way, they have used them for millions of years. Natal is going the wrong way, by making interaction totally virtual. DADA wants to make interaction absolute haptical. The technics in "Minority Report" and all multi-finger interaction are still limited and bound to a 2 dimensional screen. It is just fun but no progress in interaction, because we still use just fingertips eyes and ears to use a computer. The Goal of DADA is a instinctive direct interaction that needs no abstraction from a human real live. The Goal for DADA is to make this philosophy happen. It is not possible to steal DADA, any use of this philosophy is a support and therefore welcome. DADA has not the aim to create something “New”. It has the aim to give a computer the most natural and therefore oldest gestures back, we have. Give and Take.
It is not a Gamepad or another Idea how to use fingers to work with the computer. It is a implementation of natural human interaction using computer devices. The Goal for DADA is to change Computers in to Tools. Tools, humans can use in the way, they have used them for millions of years.

Natal is going the wrong way, by making interaction totally virtual. DADA wants to make interaction absolute haptical.
The technics in “Minority Report” and all multi-finger interaction are still limited and bound to a 2 dimensional screen. It is just fun but no progress in interaction, because we still use just fingertips eyes and ears to use a computer. The Goal of DADA is a instinctive direct interaction that needs no abstraction from a human real live.
The Goal for DADA is to make this philosophy happen. It is not possible to steal DADA, any use of this philosophy is a support and therefore welcome.

]]> By: anonymous http://palomar5.org/2009/12/19/dada-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-187 anonymous Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:08:49 +0000 http://palomar5.org/?p=1150#comment-187 nothing new here. you might want to give more people around the world from the last 20/30 years credit. nothing new here.
you might want to give more people around the world from the last 20/30 years credit.

]]> By: Carl Methews http://palomar5.org/2009/12/19/dada-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-184 Carl Methews Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:28:28 +0000 http://palomar5.org/?p=1150#comment-184 LOL you're right Laurent ;) Guys, it might be an interesting vision... unless some Asian company steals the idea, builds the device and you and tcom get nothing. Still, the Dada reference is ambiguous. LOL you’re right Laurent ;)

Guys, it might be an interesting vision… unless some Asian company steals the idea, builds the device and you and tcom get nothing.

Still, the Dada reference is ambiguous.

]]> By: Laurent http://palomar5.org/2009/12/19/dada-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-183 Laurent Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:44:41 +0000 http://palomar5.org/?p=1150#comment-183 Fail, Natal is for Xbox 360 & not for the PS3. ;) Fail, Natal is for Xbox 360 & not for the PS3. ;)

]]> By: Carl Methews http://palomar5.org/2009/12/19/dada-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-182 Carl Methews Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:05:09 +0000 http://palomar5.org/?p=1150#comment-182 Ok, guys, never heard of "Minority Report" and the Natal device for Playstation 3...? Come on! Tell us something new. Besides, calling it "Dada" is a perfect idea. Dada Technology would mean that it is redundant and not working ;) Ok, guys, never heard of “Minority Report” and the Natal device for Playstation 3…? Come on! Tell us something new.

Besides, calling it “Dada” is a perfect idea. Dada Technology would mean that it is redundant and not working ;)

]]>